Essay on:
A programme for comparative ethnology
(I)Bartholomé de Las Casas
(by: Anthony Pagdan)
After studying de Las Casas’s essay it is interesting to read Anthony Pagdan’s article, in which he describes not only de Las Casas’s views regarding the ‘Indies’, but although the opinions of his adversaries and the sources for their argumentations.
De Las Casas’s major opponent, Juan Ginés Sepúlveda, also bases his argumentation on Aristotle but he interprets his writings differently. According to Sepúlveda the Spaniards had the right to treat the ‘Indians’ the way they did because they were culturally inferior.
For me, it is really hard to understand their thoughts at that time, since today it seems so obvious that the ‘Indies’ were no barbarians or inferiors, but rather came from a different background and hence had a different culture. But Pagdan’s essay underlines that at that time de Las Casas’s way of thinking was very progressive. He was one of the first, who realized that that all human beings, even the Spaniards, “had once been barbarians” (p.141). Hence at one point at a time his ancestors were also wild and their lifestyle had probably been similar to the life of the ‘Indies’. De Las Casas discovers that all human beings live a ‘primitive’ life until one person enters the group or rises from the group and establishes a social body and after the social body is established, some kind of religion follows. Based on his Christian background it was obvious that for him Christianity was the only true religion and that other cultures could be saved by converting to Christianity (p. 142).
I just wonder why he did not realize that the ‘Indies’ probably already had some kind of social body, in which each person had a special function and that their rituals, myths and beliefs were just a different type of religion.